As AI image generation moves into its next major evolution, four models dominate the industry in 2025: Google’s Nano Banana Pro, Midjourney (V6/V7), OpenAI’s GPT-image-1, and Black Forest Labs’ Flux (Flux.2 / Flux Kontext).
Each model excels in different creative scenarios — from commercial rendering and product mockups, to stylized art, storytelling illustrations, and content-driven visuals. This article breaks down the strengths, weaknesses, and ideal use cases of all four, helping you choose the right model for your creative or business needs.
1. Overview of the Four Models#
Nano Banana Pro (Google)#
A next-generation model built on Gemini 3 Pro. Its focus is practical visual communication — diagrams, infographics, product mockups, UI layouts, multi-image compositions, and clean typography.
Midjourney (V6/V7)#
The gold standard for artistic and stylistic visuals. Midjourney remains unmatched for concept art, fantasy design, illustration style, and dramatic aesthetic control.
GPT-image-1 (OpenAI)#
A multi-modal image generator deeply integrated with GPT-4o. Excellent for storytelling workflows where text + reasoning + images need to work together smoothly.
Flux (Flux.2 / Flux Kontext)#
A high-fidelity model specializing in commercial realism, product photography, brand visuals, and consistent multi-image output. Ideal for professional rendering and advertising workflows.
2. Comparison Table: The 2025 Benchmark#
| Model | Realism | Artistic Style | Text Rendering | Controllability | Multi-Image Consistency | Speed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nano Banana Pro | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| Midjourney V6/V7 | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐ | ⭐⭐☆ | ⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| GPT-image-1 | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐½ | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| Flux / Flux.2 | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
Each model ranks differently because they target different creative purposes.
3. Nano Banana Pro: Best for Practical, Structured, Content-Driven Visuals#
Nano Banana Pro stands out because it isn’t aiming to be the most “artistic” model — instead, it is the most useful for real-world content production.
Key Advantages#
- Extremely accurate text rendering, supporting many languages
- Multi-image composition (up to 14 reference images)
- Strong layout and structural understanding
- Ideal for infographics, tutorials, wireframes, UI mock-ups
- Consistent, predictable output
Where It Beats the Others#
- Beats Midjourney & GPT in typography
- Beats Midjourney in layout consistency
- Beats GPT & Midjourney in structured content
- Competes closely with Flux for product mockups
Best For#
- Technology blogs
- UX/UI mockups
- Diagrams & instructions
- App screenshots
- E-learning visuals
- Content-heavy graphics
4. Midjourney: The Undisputed King of Visual Style#
Midjourney dominates anything requiring aesthetic quality, imagination, and visual flair.
Key Advantages#
- Most artistic / cinematic / dramatic output
- Unmatched style variety
- Beautiful lighting, composition, and mood
- Best for concept art & storytelling visuals
Where It Beats the Others#
- Top for art, fantasy, gaming, illustration
- Best for album covers, character art, concept sketches
Limitations#
- Weak text rendering (typography often gibberish)
- Limited controllability
- Multi-image consistency is low
Best For#
- Artists
- Designers
- Creatives
- Fantasy / sci-fi visuals
- Book covers
- Moodboards
5. GPT-image-1: Best for Multi-Modal Storytelling#
GPT-image-1 shines in scenarios where text and images must work together seamlessly.
Key Advantages#
- Best at interpreting narrative prompts
- Great for storybooks, scripts, and scene illustration
- Fast iteration inside GPT chat workflows
- Highly integrated reasoning (e.g., generate story → generate scenes → generate variations)
Where It Beats the Others#
- Best for text-driven content creation
- Perfect for AI writers, story generators, education tools
Limitations#
- Inconsistency with detailed scenes
- Style quality behind Midjourney
- Text in images is only moderate
Best For#
- Story illustrators
- Bloggers
- Educators
- AI writing workflows
- Children’s book creation
- Idea exploration
6. Flux: The Commercial Rendering Powerhouse#
Flux is built with a photography + product design + brand marketing mindset. If your goal is realistic visuals, this is the strongest model in 2025.
Key Advantages#
- Best realism & product rendering
- Superior multi-image consistency
- Great for ads, product sheets, packaging, and branding
- Strong text & layout (better than Midjourney)
- Photography-grade lighting & angles
Where It Beats the Others#
- Best for e-commerce, advertising, marketing visuals
- Outperforms Nano Banana in photorealism
- Beats GPT & MJ in professional consistency
Limitations#
- Less creative than Midjourney
- Not as structured as Nano Banana Pro
Best For#
- Commercial marketing teams
- E-commerce
- Design studios
- Photorealistic product design
- Packaging / branding mockups
7. Which Model Should You Use? (Simple Guide)#
✔ For product images / advertising / commercial visuals → Flux#
✔ For infographics / UI mockups / structured content → Nano Banana Pro#
✔ For fantasy / illustration / art direction → Midjourney#
✔ For storytelling, text + image workflows → GPT-image-1#
8. Final Verdict#
There is no “best overall” image model — only the best model for your specific task:
- Nano Banana Pro is the most practical for information-heavy visuals.
- Midjourney is the most artistic and visually impressive.
- GPT-image-1 is the best for narrative workflows and text-image synergy.
- Flux is the most professional for realistic and commercial rendering.
In 2025, the smartest creatives aren’t choosing one model — they’re combining them. Use Midjourney for style → Flux for realism → Nano Banana Pro for layout → GPT-image-1 for narrative.
This is the new creative workflow.
Try Nano Banana Pro: https://story321.com/image/text-to-image Banana Pro Image
